In one of the passages reads: "The results, in terms of reconstruction of the facts appear potentially schizophrenic. And, in fact, according to the rules in force today, could come to rebuild a fact different (although identical naturalistically) for each defendant, depending on the elements used to it and some may come in the abstract, to deny the very existence of done. "
In essence, the criminal trial does not serve to establish the truth about an event (apparently constituting a crime), but only to determine whether in respect of a particular person, based on procedural rules in force at the time of the procedure, this event is are met and saw him involved potersene to the point of assigning responsibility. " "It is - they wrote the judges - a choice of civilization that this college can only take into account and which should be paid but do not excuse compliance with, where possible, to seek a unity of each case regarding the number of parties held accountable for the same offense. "
Audio - Initial evaluations hot Saverio Ferrari, the Centre on the new democratic right
16 febbraio 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment