Your quanto in questi giorni sta accadendo in Libya, if stann dicendo un po 'troppe fesserie or comunque informazioni little verosimili or non verificate assoluta, che però vengono prese da cholate per gold certified "media "ben che i soliti conosciamo, e purtroppo prese per Buone and ridiffuse uncritically gives so many people, compagni anche che non si soffermano a leggere ea pensare bene dicendo che stann.
Things like:
- Gaddafi immediately fled to Venezuela (the typical move "kill two birds with one stone" in one fell swoop you discredit two "enemies")
- Apache helicopters and F-air 16, which bombard the crowd (these means we will have only the U.S., Israel and a few others, certainly not Libya)
- flags of the corrupt reign of Idris passed off as banners of rebellion and freedom, even used to make the pictures " Free Libya "or something, when in fact the kingdom of Idris until 1969 was a semi-colonial regime in the service of Western interests: it is as if we used the flag to fight Berlusconi Savoy ... Where are then tante bandiere reali, le hanno conservate nel cassetto per più di quarant'anni?
- "testimonianze" non si sa bene di chi (magari da "Twitter" o simili, cioé di chiunque da qualunque parte) che parlano di caos e disordine e morti dappertutto etc. e poi altri invece che dicono che è tutto calmo e che al massimo ci sono stati incidenti in periferia - a chi credere, e come? Ma perché certi "media" credono sempre e solo da una parte, in genere quella più "tremendista"?
- video su Youtube che dicono molto di più nella loro presentazione a effetto che nel loro effettivo contenuto, come uno in cui non si capisce chi sono i morti e ammazzati da chi e come (e non si vedono comunque né bombardamenti aircraft or rockets into the crowd or anything like that), or another showing of individual graves but are called "mass graves", and perhaps speculate on the disease of the dead, the "images that may hurt the feeling" as to make them more " interesting "
- and then the number of deaths, which dances between two hundred, thousand, ten thousand ... are given their numbers, it said that the report that told him that the other ... maybe being thousands of miles away, but just his "authority" is credible because whatever ...
In short, it is clear that in this story there are many, many interests at stake, and the situation is confusing, but it is certainly more complex than some people would have us believe, with the mythologies of "popular movements", "heroic young people for freedom" and the like. So, critical companions, make an effort of analysis and understanding before you believe and put around certain "news" - even better if you make an effort to seek alternative sources - and most importantly, great caution and suspicion, especially when certain things come from some sources that we know are professionals lie and manipulation. For what they say and not say, and how they say it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment